Skip to content
Melissa Kuo
← All work

Case study 01 · 2025–Present

Intelligence Suite

Making enterprise AI usable, scalable, and trustworthy

Turning an engineering proof of concept into Salsify’s highest-selling module

Role
Sole Senior Product Designer
Team
1 Product Manager, 1 Engineering Manager, 6 Software Engineers
Timeline
May–October 2025 for MVP; ongoing iterations
Responsibilities
MVP scoping, configuration redesign, trust & review UX, AI Accelerators creation, usage analysis
Three overlapping screens showing the Intelligence Suite journey: the App Center filtered to Accelerators, with the Seasonal Content Optimizer first; the AI task’s prompt configuration panel; and the AI-Generated Content Review, with suggestions shown as tracked changes and an AI explanation beside each

From finding an Accelerator, to setting up its prompt, to reviewing the AI’s suggestions. Suggestions arrive as drafts with tracked changes and an explanation for each, so customers stay in control of what reaches their product data.

01 · Context

Bringing AI into everyday workflows

Brands and distributors use Salsify as a source of truth for the ecommerce product data and assets they need to sell across online retailers. As generative AI became more prevalent, we saw an opportunity to automate time-consuming manual work and help customers work more efficiently.

The business wanted to bring AI capabilities to market quickly and establish Salsify as a leader in the space. Engineering had already demonstrated what was possible through an internal proof of concept (POC), and our team was tasked with turning it into a production-ready MVP. I led the UX strategy, discovery, and design required to create a customer-ready experience.

The result was Intelligence Suite, which embedded AI capabilities into Workflow, Salsify’s tool for automating product data processes through repeatable steps, rules, and human review. Customers could generate, extract, and optimize content at scale while reviewing results before committing changes to their data.

02 · The challenge

Making AI work within real-world constraints

The POC proved the technology worked, but the experience reflected its technical architecture rather than customers’ mental models. Configuration was considerably longer than existing Workflows, with dense settings, technical terminology, and controls whose effects weren’t always obvious. Output quality also depended heavily on the prompts customers wrote—another hurdle for users who weren’t AI or Workflow experts.

We couldn’t redesign Workflow from scratch. Intelligence Suite had to fit its existing patterns and technical constraints without disrupting established customer processes.

The stakes were high: inaccurate AI outputs could affect product data at scale, introducing customer trust, financial, and regulatory risks.

The proof of concept’s AI Text Generation configuration panel, with its large help tooltips

The proof of concept’s AI Text Generation configuration: long, dense, and reliant on large help tooltips.

The proof of concept’s AI Text Generation configuration panel, with its large help tooltips

The proof of concept’s AI Text Generation configuration: long, dense, and reliant on large help tooltips.

  1. 01

    Long setup

    Configuration was considerably longer than existing Workflows.

  2. 02

    Hidden behavior

    “Show/Hide” toggles for advanced configuration, with effects that appeared below the fold.

  3. 03

    Technical terminology

    Settings like Provider Secret Configuration, Token Configuration, and a raw JSON response format.

  4. 04

    Oversized hover tooltips

    Help needed to complete setup was tucked into large hover tooltips.

03

Understanding the complexity, and deciding what not to ship for the MVP

Before deciding what belonged in the MVP, I needed to understand the system myself. Configuration changed by AI task (such as text generation or image analysis), the product data or assets involved, and dependencies among settings. Even after exploring the POC, some relationships remained unclear.

I mapped these scenarios to identify what users needed to configure and where we could simplify the experience.

Configuration walkthrough in FigJam: for AI Text Generation and AI Image Analysis, each workflow step’s configuration panel mapped to the task view it produces

Configuration walkthrough mapping each workflow step’s settings to the task view it produces, for AI Text Generation (blue) and AI Image Analysis (green).

Configuration walkthrough in FigJam: for AI Text Generation and AI Image Analysis, each workflow step’s configuration panel mapped to the task view it produces
Configuration walkthrough mapping each workflow step’s settings to the task view it produces, for AI Text Generation (blue) and AI Image Analysis (green).

Deciding what not to ship

With roughly five months to launch, we couldn’t assume every POC capability belonged in the MVP. I led a detailed review with product and engineering, evaluating configuration options one by one and drawing on feedback from customer-facing teams.

The instinct was to offer maximum flexibility, but several advanced controls were difficult to explain, even internally, and it wasn’t clear when customers would benefit from changing the defaults. We chose a simpler starting experience, deferring options whose complexity outweighed their immediate value. This was applicable for sections like debugging responses, response formats and context keys, and defining custom review behavior other than reviewing for suggestions or directly editing.

POC configuration options and which made the October release (red = cut)
Included in POC?Included for Oct release?
Show/hide Advanced Configuration toggleYesNo
AI provider detailsYesYes
Debug options, debug responseYesNo
Show/hide Product Properties toggleYesNo
Prompt configuration text boxYesYes
Additional Context text boxYesYes – text support only (no code block)

04

Redesigning around how customers actually work

Once we’d clarified the MVP scope, I reorganized configuration within Workflow’s existing UI patterns to follow the order in which customers would complete their tasks.

The result was a more focused configuration experience that preserved necessary flexibility without exposing every technical detail up front.

POC

Before: the proof of concept’s configuration panel

Shipped

After: the shipped configuration panel, grouped into clear sections

The proof of concept’s configuration (left) next to the shipped panel (right): shorter, and grouped into clear sections. Numbers match the principles beside.

POC

Before: the proof of concept’s configuration panel

Shipped

After: the shipped configuration panel, grouped into clear sections

The proof of concept’s configuration (left) next to the shipped panel (right): shorter, and grouped into clear sections. Numbers match the principles beside.

  1. 01

    Keep critical guidance in context

    Put necessary help directly beside the relevant settings instead of hiding it in oversized hover tooltips.

  2. 02

    Separate configuration from education

    Move deeper technical explanations to supporting enablement resources so they didn’t interrupt setup.

  3. 03

    Create meaningful hierarchy

    Group related settings into clear sections and sequence them around the task rather than the underlying system.

  4. 04

    Make important controls visible

    Remove unnecessary “advanced configuration” toggles so users could see essential options and their effects without searching below the fold.

05

Building trust through transparency and control

Simpler configuration wasn’t enough. Because AI could change large volumes of product data, customers needed ways to understand recommendations and control when changes became final.

  • Explain recommendations

    For review-based workflows, I defaulted to showing explanations alongside AI-generated results so customers had context for evaluating them.

  • Make review the default, not the only option

    We used Workflow’s existing draft functionality to encourage human review before updating live data. Initially, we planned to remove direct editing altogether. But customer-facing teams surfaced use cases where it was necessary, such as generating alt text for images or adding metadata to images, so we restored it with a warning banner added and kept review-first behavior as the default.

  • Build on familiar safeguards

    These choices reflected longstanding customer feedback across Salsify: users wanted the product to teach them how to complete unfamiliar tasks rather than assume expertise.

Default

Suggestion handling settings: Save results as “Create draft for review”, with “Include explanation for suggestions” turned on

With warning

Feature added back in after stakeholder feedback

Suggestion handling settings with a warning: AI suggestions will be applied automatically without human review, and a human validation step is recommended
By default, AI suggestions are saved as drafts for review, with explanations turned on. Applying suggestions automatically shows a warning that recommends a human review step.

06

Helping customers get started without becoming AI experts

Even a clearer setup couldn’t solve a fundamental challenge: most customers weren’t experienced prompt writers. Starting from a blank field would slow adoption.

For the MVP, our team turned 13 high-value use cases (previously identified through earlier customer and stakeholder input that went into creating the POC) into pre-packaged AI Accelerators. We created, refined, and tested prompt templates so customers could begin with useful configurations rather than build workflows from scratch. We also designed prompt writing best practices, enablement on how to use each accelerator, and how to ensure users took advantage of the functionality.

One example was content optimization. Customers with small content teams—or lengthy review processes—could use an Accelerator to adapt existing marketing copy for seasonal campaigns, shopping events, or different audiences instead of repeatedly rewriting it by hand.

The goal was to give customers a faster path to value while helping them learn how to build and adapt their own AI workflows over time.

The Seasonal Content Optimization Accelerator: a ready-made workflow (AI Text Generation, then AI Review) with a pre-written prompt and an Additional context field asking only for a season or holiday

The Seasonal Content Optimization Accelerator: example of a ready-made workflow and pre-written prompt, based on a high-value customer need. Customers only need to enter the season or holiday to get started.

The Seasonal Content Optimization Accelerator: a ready-made workflow (AI Text Generation, then AI Review) with a pre-written prompt and an Additional context field asking only for a season or holiday

The Seasonal Content Optimization Accelerator: example of a ready-made workflow and pre-written prompt, based on a high-value customer need. Customers only need to enter the season or holiday to get started.

  1. 01

    Ready-made workflow

    AI generation and review steps come already connected.

  2. 02

    Pre-written, quality-tested prompt

    The prompt for seasonal content optimization is written and tested in advance.

  3. 03

    One thing to fill in

    Customers just enter a season or holiday to get started.

07

Letting customer needs shape what came next

The MVP launch began an ongoing cycle of discovery and prioritization. Image generation was emerging as a likely next investment: customers and Sales teams were asking for it, and our team’s model testing was producing more promising results.

Ahead of our annual customer conference, I facilitated a user-story mapping workshop with product and engineering to surface dependencies, align on the end-to-end experience, and decide what we could prototype for the next milestone.

We shared future concepts with hundreds of customers at the conference, alongside continued customer interviews and feedback from customer-facing teams. That input helped us create 6 additional image-generation accelerators around tasks customers were otherwise handling manually or outsourcing to agencies: tasks like creating lifestyle images, image variants, hero images for multipacks and highlighting attributes, and infographics.

We also had to adapt the roadmap as AI capabilities and requirements evolved, including unplanned compliance work related to the EU AI Act to add visible watermarking and filters for AI-generated images.

Post-MVP user story map, organized by user goals and steps, with milestones for the customer conference and GA release

Post-MVP user story map, organized by user goals and steps, with milestones for the customer conference and GA release.

Post-MVP user story map, organized by user goals and steps, with milestones for the customer conference and GA release
Post-MVP user story map, organized by user goals and steps, with milestones for the customer conference and GA release.

08 · Impact

From launch to real-world adoption

Highest-selling module in Salsify’s history
#1Highest-selling module in Salsify’s history
Production-ready AI Accelerators across MVP and subsequent releases
19Production-ready AI Accelerators across MVP and subsequent releases
Workflows aligned with existing Accelerators
~80%Workflows aligned with existing Accelerators

Intelligence Suite became Salsify’s highest-selling module to date. Customers also reported meaningful time savings from AI-powered workflows, giving them more time for higher-priority work.

Understanding real-world usage

Our usage dashboard suggested that most customers weren’t using Accelerators at all, which seemed unlikely. To find out what was really happening, I analyzed customer configuration and prompt data using Claude and internal data tables to see how customers were applying AI in practice.

Approximately 80% of workflows aligned with our 19 existing Accelerators. This supported our initial selection of use cases while revealing emerging patterns to monitor for potential future templates.

The analysis also pointed to a gap in how usage data was being captured, which I flagged to our data team for further investigation.

  1. What the dashboard said

    ~70% of workflows weren’t using Accelerators.

  2. What the analysis showed

    ~80% of workflows aligned with existing Accelerators.

  3. What happened next

    A data-capture gap flagged to the data team for investigation.

What I’d explore next

Embedding AI into Workflow delivered value quickly, but configuration still required more time and product knowledge than I wanted. Based on my own experience and recurring snippets of customer and stakeholder feedback, I suspect the first successful setup remained a major hurdle.

I’d explore a more guided, hands-on experience that walks customers through creating their first high-value AI workflow, then helps them confidently customize and build their own.